Why Spotify Is Wrong For Banning R. Kelly
Last week, Spotify announced a new policy to curb content that “expressly and principally promotes, advocates, or incites hatred or violence against a group or individual based on characteristics, including, race, religion, gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, veteran status, or disability.” With one sexual allegation after the other, a #MuteRKelly social media campaign started and Spotify removed R. Kelly from their promoted music playlists.
Only one more artist, Xxxtentacion, who is also facing aggravated battery charges against a pregnant woman has had his music removed from Spotify’s promoted playlists.
R. Kelly, in usual fashion released a statement denying the allegations, and proclaiming his love and passion for women. While I don’t care much for his statement, the second to the last part is however hard to ignore: ‘Meanwhile, though, Spotify promotes numerous other artists who are convicted felons, others who have been arrested on charges of domestic violence and artists who sing lyrics that are violent and anti-women in nature.’ Xxxtentacion in a statement to the New York Times has also asked why musicians accused of committing the same crimes haven’t been subjected to the same treatment.
Spotify is wrong for what there doing to artist like R Kelly and xxxtentacion. There not even convicted of any thing.— 50cent (@50cent) May 10, 2018
While I don’t believe censorship is the answer, I do believe in some sort of punishment for these guys. Music streaming services who make money off these guys can’t afford to single out some offenders and leave others. The decision to separate the art from the artist should be left for the listener to decide.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment